[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Infamous "Amoxil Rash"

In the particular situation Michael quotes, with a non-urticarial exanthematous rash associated with Amoxil, I have been telling parents for years that this is an adverse reaction to Amoxil, but not an allergic reaction. When the rash appears while the child is still taking the medicine, I tell the parent to complete the Amoxil course, since the rash will go away in 3 or 4 days whether the medicine is continued or not. For subsequent illnesses, I prescribe penicillins as if no reaction had occurred. In the dim dark recesses of my knowledge, I remember reading that this rash is not IgE-mediated, so there should be no additional risk of subsequent anaphylaxis, but I cannot give you the reference. (Pediatrics in Review comes to mind, though).
So far, no problems with this advice.
David Arkin, MD
Richmond, VA



From: Michael Sachs <>
Reply-To: Michael Sachs <>
To: 
Subject: Re: The Infamous "Amoxil Rash"
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:12:37 -0800

In a message dated 2/14/2002 1:40:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 writes:


> Anyone have any information on the infamous "Amoxil (amoxicillin) rash"?



At 04:31 PM 2/17/02 -0500, wrote:
No data, but I certainly see it. That's why I ask lots of questions when
parents tell me their child is allergic to something. You really have to
find out what kind of reaction they had. Many tell me they vomited, or had
some diarrhea, or something else like that. Rashes are tougher, because they
don't always remember what it looked like or whether it itched. If I'm not
really sure, I let them know that testing is available for penicillin
allergy.


Moshe Adler, MD


I seem to recall reading somewhere that 70-80% of people who report a
penicillin allergy actually are not allergic.

Sometimes when I'm pretty confident that a non-urticarial rash is likely
one of these idiosyncratic Amoxil rashes or maybe a non-specific viral
exanthem I'll try Amoxil again at some point in the future.  I've rarely
seen the rash duplicated on a subsequent course of Amoxil.

So here's a question back to the list: If a child has had a non-severe,
non-specific, non-systemic, non-urticarial rash associated with Amoxil in
the past, is there likely to be a significant risk of anaphylaxis with
trying another course before doing formal skin or RAST testing? Any opinions?




Michael Sachs, M.D.
General Pediatrician



_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com