[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Article - Medical Error Legislation

Another perspective on tort reform: when there are no more torts, it won't
matter how many personal injury lawyers there are.

Voluntary efforts won't work
By Michael L. Millenson
USA Today
August 5, 2004
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20040805/6427034s.htm

The usually quarrelsome U.S. Senate recently approved medical-error
legislation by a unanimous voice vote -- reason enough for citizen suspicion.
When no
special interest wants to fight something, it's usually the public interest
that's losing out.

Although groups representing doctors and hospitals praised the bill's
prescription of a confidential, voluntary reporting system as good medicine,
the
reality resembles a placebo more than a truly potent cure. Instead of taking a
significant step forward, Congress sidestepped the chance to support health
professionals who have spent years trying to get colleagues to provide safer
care.

Congress correctly agreed with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) diagnosis that
we need a system fix rather than finger-pointing at individuals.
Unfortunately, Congress also ignored the scientific literature on systemic
behavior
change. Tipping points don't come about from tiptoeing timidly. While
voluntarism is
valuable, it has been five years since a landmark IOM report made patient
safety a public scandal. During that time, doctors and hospitals have not
voluntarily organized to stop the preventable deaths and injuries of hundreds
of
thousands of patients with anything close to the energy used to battle
malpractice
awards worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Doctors and hospital managers are not venal and uncaring. In fact, many care
so much that they find it too painful to face up to the commonplace nature of
errors. As a result, doctors routinely protest that the patient-safety issue
is overblown. I've seen it firsthand hundreds of times. If you really believe
in systemic change, you have to be willing to shock a lethargic system into
abandoning the status quo.

The way to do that is with the mandatory reporting of serious errors. In
Minnesota, for example, progressive hospitals supported the mandatory
reporting
and analysis of 27 serious events, along with appropriate confidentiality and
legal ''safe harbor'' provisions. Moreover, errors are tabulated and made
public
each year. Across the U.S., a few courageous hospitals even involve patient
representatives in error-prevention panels.

No member of Congress would think of making airline-crash prevention
voluntary. Protecting the sick and the vulnerable among us is surely at least
as
important.

Michael L. Millenson is author of "Demanding Medical Excellence: Doctors and
Accountability in the Information Age."