[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dr. Sach's dilemma

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message is from PedTalk!  To reply to the group, use .
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The baby could easily be cared for without leaving the mom's side--that's one
thing you can give her without any problem.  She might consent to the blood
sugar monitoring if it could be done in her room;  the baby can be put to
breast immediately and nursed frequently, which might well obviate the need
to supplement (which I would only use if the baby were truly symptomatic or
had very low glucose).  The vitamin K shot could easily be deferred until you
had time to go talk with the family the next morning and explain why you
would like to do it.

This is somewhat difficult, but not at all impossible.  In our "routine" care
of newborns, we do a lot of things that are truly unnecessary and not always
in the best interests of babies--like separating them from their moms, doing
unnecessary tests & procedures, and interfering with normal lactation.  With
a this mom, some explanations of "why" each thing needs to be done and a
promise to keep the baby with her could go a long way.  I'm a pediatrician
and mother of 4 and I didn't let my babies out of my sight, either, after
they were born--I know only too well the tendency of hospital nurseries to do
things that aren't in the baby's best interests (like give inappropriate
artificial feedings to breastfed babies), and I wasn't taking any chances.
 So, I do understand where this mom is coming from, and I sympathize.

Good luck.

Linda L. Shaw MD