[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Babywise debate

>  Do you think that after six months old a child has a basic inherent need
> for night feedings?
> If there are a majority of responses indicating "need" at six months,
I'll
> consider myself humbled.
>
> Michael Sachs, M.D.
> General Pediatrician

What I think (and from practical experience with my daughter) is that there
is NOT an inherent need for night feedings after ABOUT the age of 6 months.
 Amina (who is almost a year old) has had a *few* bottles in the middle of
the night when she wasn't feeling well.  I knew that she wasn't eating well
during the day because she had a cold, or whatever, so she seemed happier
after getting a night feeding just for those particular times.  I usually
find out from the parents if the baby is able to *occasionally* sleep
through night - if they can, then there's definitely not a need for the
night feeding and they can be counselled on how to get the baby "weaned".
This is what I used to determine when to cut out the night feeding with
Amina - actually happened when she was about 5 months old.  I happen to
agree with Barton Schmitt - kids can definitely be "trained" to feed at
night which has many implications - TIRED parents, poor sleeping habits,
dental caries, etc.

Thanks to everyone who replied about the Babywise book.   The parents of
the 36 weeker have an appointment with me tomorrow and I printed out the
responses to give them an idea of some of the concerns about this book.

Eve H. Switzer, M.D.