[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MMR boosters

Until two yrs. ago when the state of Texas mandated that the second MMR be
given at pre-K entrance I had been giving the vaccine at age 11 with the
rationale that this was the immune response would be nicely boosted
throughout high school and college- I really hated to change my ways-
especially to add a second shot to the tearful four year old group.  Then
around 6 months ago (might be longer- time flies when you're having fun) I
read an article somewhere (?Pediatrics maybe) that showed that there are
side effects in children who get the MMR booster at
age 4-6 than at age 11-12.  It made me feel a little better about having to
change.  Does anybody remember that article.  Regards Kim Burlingham, MD
Rural Peds in East Texas USA. where thanks to El Ni~o it is so dry that the
town fireworks have been canceled for fear of burning the place
down...Happy Fourth of July:)))).
----------
> From: 
> To: 
> Subject: Re: MMR boosters
> Date: Saturday, July 04, 1998 8:16 AM
>
> In a message dated 7/3/1998 12:00:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>  writes:
>
> > I had thought that years ago I had read that you get a better
> >  anamnestic response by giving the 2nd booster later (like just before
> >  middle school) but most states have opted to MMR before KG because of
the
> >  higher percentage of kids that are seen by health officials at that
time.
> >
> I had the same perception, but I'm not sure where I read it.  The
original
> recommendation from the AAP was for a 2nd dose before middle school, but
the
> CDC said to do it before Kg, and all the health depts and school boards
> usually use CDC recommendations.
>
> Moshe Adler, MD
>
group.
>