[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Diagnosing and Treating AOM in Children with PE Tubes

Pushing water through a PE tube won't quite tell you the answer. Remember,
the space behind a PE tube in place (maybe 1 ml?) is much smaller than the
space in your experimental setup. In addition, viscousity of fluid behind
the ear drum is much different than the viscousity of water. While
interesting, I do not think it will give you the answer you are looking for.

Jeff Utz

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  [mailto:]On Behalf Of
> Graham Barden
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 9:41 PM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: Diagnosing and Treating AOM in Children with PE Tubes
>
>
> I don't think that is true, I guess the next time I pull a PE
> tube out of an ear canal, I'll see how much of a water column
> it takes to push water through. I think the water will easily
> flow. The lumen is much larger than an 18g needle and water
> will easily fall out of an open syringe with 1.5 inches of
> depth.
> -g barden
>
> Tom Hargrove wrote:
> >
> > Using some law from Physics that I forgot a long time ago, it
> takes about 6
> > feet of water depth to force water through the lumen of a
> standard PE tube.
> > The ENT literature is pretty clear that ear plugs aren't
> necessary for most
> > kids with tubes.  Based on my clinical experience, I'm not sure
> that water
> > in the ears plays much of a role in purulent drainage from
> tubes; most of
> > these patients have cold or allergic rhinitis symptoms also--a
> more likely
> > culprit.
> >
> > Tom Hargrove, MD, FAAP
> >
>
> discussion group.
>